Commercial Law - Assessment 1

NAME :xxxxxxxxxxxDEGREE :xxxxxxxxxxxxSUPERVISOR :xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx TITLE : moneymaking(prenominal) Law - Assessment 1STUDENT NoPart A1 . In what court was the causal broker heardNew South Wales coercive coquet , rectitude Division2 . urinate the think and explain his titleJudge rein in A . J3 . Name the plaintiff and guess and counsel representing themPeter Smythe (PlaintiffB . Kasep (Plaintiff s CounselVincent Thomas (DefendantD . M . Loewenstein (Defendant Counsel4 . What fussy circumstances light-emitting diode rein in AJ to doubt the believability of the suspect s version of eventsInconsistency in plaintiff account of events and compacts d oneness . For sheath , the suspect occupys to harbor mentioned of betraying the aircraft and after revaluation by the dealer , which was not mentioned on eBay website5 . The suspect argued at that ordinate was no binding and enforceable agreement what were the components of the defendant s argumentFirst , the defendant claimed that eBay was did not work comparable the traditional auction sales agreement . maculation , amongst the defendant and plaintiff had compose agreements on the aircraft purchase6 . How is agreement reached in a traditional auctionHighest pleadder agrees to buy the auctioned nifty at resolve of the peter7 . What differences did Rein A J outline between a traditional auction and an online auctionThere is human operator in traditional auction , auctioneer serves as vendor s gene , and the seller can abstract a good from the auction anytime before fall of the hammer8 . What did Rein A J enter in an eBay auction as the equivalent of the fall of the hammer in a traditional auction and what is the conditional coition of eachClose of beseech session and the visual aspect of won message on buyer s screen9 . wherefore did Rein A J unchurch an for specific performance of the bargain appropriate in this caseNature of the stipulation , the good was of high bore , vintage and an unusual ledgeman point in the auction10 .

wherefore was the nett not do in this hearingMore deliberations with both sides counsel11 . Why was the matter heard in the Supreme CourtComplexity of the case - defendants and plaintiff were from different regions (court jurisdictions ) and the auctioneer (eBay ) from some early(a) countryPart B1 . Has gobbler reached an agreement gobbler and Dick did not obtain a contract regarding sale of motor roll . They had on the dot discussed over the matter meagre failed to agree on final price tom insisted on selling sit for AU vitamin D0 , whereas the later insisted could only false character with AU 4500 . turkey cock thus has no claim on the motor calendar method of birth control even after procreation his swordplay by 500 , to AU 4500 . In sum total Tom had not expressed opinion that he would be re engageing or raising his bid on the motor cycle . Had that been the case , there could have been obligated (under an agreement ) to consider Tom s new bid before accepting another(prenominal)(prenominal) one from any other interested party . In this regard , Dave is free to sell his motor cycle to another several(prenominal) (Theodore 2006...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper