In his book The 11 Myths of Media Violence, Potter states that the context is more all-important(a) than frequency because the context gives the audience the information about how the violence should be interpreted (141).

Imagine a person pass across the street is unexpectedly hit by a car, if the driver demoralizes out and tries to render aid to the victim, the audience perceives this violence as accidental and takes in the message to look some(prenominal) ways before crossing the street. However, if the driver had gotten out of his fomite and explained how he intentionally ran over the victim because the victim had off his family, that violence, while still being horrific, would have some acknowledgment to it, sending the message that violence is a means of retribution. The ii previous scenarios show the same violence, but the context changes from accidental violence to gratuitous murder, but which context is more damaging to the audience? Context of violence is often affected...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment