The Box Tree Case

Strike always results to the loss of assert between the employer and contact lens workers. In the case of the Box Tree Restaurant, the workers went on strike subsequently losing their trust on their former employer, Augustin Paege, who denied them of their commissions because he wanted to reduce his paysheet expenses by $100,000. After the strike, these workers could be pass judgment to hold back as far as trusting their employer is concerned. On the other hand, after what Baruch and her switching employees went through at the hands of the striking workers, they argon not expected either to easily trust the move workers.The most critical put-on for Gila Baruch, therefore, if she wants to restore the once sterling reputation of Box Tree, is to rebuild trust among all parties concerned. (Corsun, Young, & Shinnar, n. d. ) The situation, however, is not hopeless. Rebuilding trust is still possible. except they should do several things urgently. First, everybody should resort to self-acceptance. This means that they should learn to accept who they are and be secured in their identity so that they could develop trust in others. (Messina, n. d.) For instance, Baruch should accept the fact that if not for the strike she would not end up owning a promising business. The replacement workers are on the same ride as Baruch. They give the strikers to thank for their jobs. If not for the strike, there would not withdraw been any vacancy in the restaurant for them to fill. In addition, they should not allow that they, too, are workingmen like the strikers and as such, want to be fairly paying(a) for their time and effort exactly what the strikers wanted in the first place.Finally, the reverting strikers should be aware that they are also indebted to Baruch and the replacement workers who scram it possible for the Box Tree to stay in operation in spite of the work stoppage that they tried to instigate. Without them, the restaurant would have collapsed, they would have completely lost their jobs, and then their strike would have been an exercise in futility. Once they accept who they are and what the strike has d genius for their benefits, they should be satisfactory to trust each other because their livelihood, in fact, clearly depends on one another.Another way by which trust could be rebuilt is for everybody to work unstated for the creation of a healing environment. This means that Baruch, the replacement workers, and the sireing strikers should adopt a healing mode which will enable everybody to employ forgiveness, understanding, and healthy conversation to resolve problems and issues. Once they are in this mode, they would be able to exit the insults and the animosities during the strike and heal the wounds they created, thereby allowing for an atmosphere conducive for the rebuilding of trust.(Messina, n. d. ) They, curiously the replacement workers and the returning strikers, should also strive for a reduction of a sen se of competition. In other words, they should do away with their jealousies and stop macrocosm defensive with one another. Instead, everybody should start cooperating for the common good. (Messina, n. d. ) The replacement workers, specifically, should not make a big thing out of the seniority status afforded the returning strikers and instead accept the fact that they joined the company at a much later time.The affected parties should likewise let go of their fear. tutelage is such a restricting feeling which impedes people from behaving normally and objectively towards one another. A person who fears another for any reason could neer trust that person. (Messina, n. d. ) The replacement workers, for instance, should not feel threatened by the return of the strikers. They should find security in Baruchs desire to reward their hard work and loyalty during the strike. (Corsun, Young, & Shinnar, n. d.) The returning workers, on the other hand, should not be afraid that Baruch w ill be treating them with suspicion because of what they did. They should instead designate Baruch that they mean no harm for her and the restaurant and that their only reason for returning to their jobs was to resume working and continue earning for their families. Reference Corsun, D. L. , Young, C. A. & Shinnar, R. S. (n. d. ). The Box Tree. tramp 32096240 attachment. Messina, J. J. (n. d. ). Building Trust. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http//www. coping. org/growth/trust. htm