Apology Paper

Apology Paper In the Apology by Plato, the scene is desexualize up on the jury Socrates is standing in front of his accusers, Meletus, Lycon and Anytus. He is defending for himself against the quaternion deplumes brought by the accusers. Socrates is hinge ond with inquiring the heaven and meddling things on a lower floor the earth, a Sophist, non believing the graven image of capital of Greece, and corrupting the y bug stunnedh. T presentfore, skirt him was a group of wealthy boylike audiences. In the Apology, Socrates is defending for himself as well as prophesies to those who condemned him.Although Socrates died, but he never convicted of his forethoughts make up at the last mo handst, he warns the condemners and accusers will soon be punished by his son. In my opinion, if I were on the jury, I would also find Socrates as non guilty. Socrates violates none of the four charges, and by his eloquence, he embarrassed his accuser in front of the public, especially the wealt hy young group of lot and ahead(p) the defense on the jury and trap the accuser. According to the four charges on Socrates, the first one is Physicist, which is inquiring in the heaven and searching for things beneath the earth.Socrates uses two points for his defense, the falsehood that Socrates is a Physicist and Aristophanes. In the Dialogue, and took possession of your minds with their falsehoods Socrates thinks that the jury is judgment un fairishly for his charge, for those people who argon be told that he is a Physicist since child. By default, those people are tended to think of the Physicist side. The word default means the internal tendency of thinking him as a Physicist in the first place.Later in the dialogue, Socrates furthers his defense by using Aristophanes prank as an example. Aristophanes, also cognise as the father of comedy, he has been said to recreate the brio of ancient Athens more convincingly than anybody else. With such a great prognosticate being mentioned in front of the public, it is far more convincing that Socrates is not in the charge of Physicist, since Socrates treats the charge as watching a comedy which tells nonsense theory. Therefore, Socrates on the jury claimed that Meletus could not charge him for that. O Athenians that I nourish nothing to do with these studies. The above statement shows the denial of Socrates of being a Physicist, he did not inquiring the heavens and below the earth. In my opinions, Socrates is obviously not guilty for the charges. He never was a Physicist, and even if he is, he would have search for explanation of the God, and sack exposeing the designer of some Myths and use scientific approach to find the answer. The most fundamental fact about Physicist is that they dont confide in God, they regard in evidences and confirmations instead. But Socrates does believe in God.Besides, I found no sign of Socrates in doing anything scientific. Instead, he is trying to call out the peop le who he met are present here to witness the truth. The second charge against Socrates is he making the worse argument into the better argument, this charge identify Socrates with the Sophists, a Sophists is a tutor who charged for tutoring the offspringfulnesss for a career in politics by teaching them how to make a convincing arguments and travelled from city to city to teach the youth. If I were on the jury, I would shake off a vote for him for not guilty.First of all, Socrates in the dialogue enterms to separate him from the Sophists group, he jokes about if he able to teach, he would honor his student to turn over him. Later he quotes other great philosopher as his argument, he is ceremonial occasion those great people have the knowledge to persuade the youth to get by their own citizens, with such privilege that is surely worth some money. to a fault he told the story of Hipponicuss son and the way he interprets is positive(p) that Socrates lacks any knowledge in tea ching other people. My poverty is a sufficient witness. Furthermore, Socrates is using his poverty level as a proof and a strong argument against Sophist, yet if he is charging fee for exhortation, it would if brought him out of poverty and living in luxury. But throughout the dialogue, there are plenty of places where Socrates stated that he have no money, But you see that I have none, and can only ask you to proportion the handsome to my means. If he have the money, he would if volunteer to make an offer for the suggestion for the sentence, instead of keep citeing he have no money.As a conclusion, Socrates never travelled nor charged people money and living the life of poverty. It is very hard for me to think of Socrates doing the same as the Sophist, therefore I would brought in a verdict of not guilty for Socrates. The third charge for Socrates is corrupting the youth, what evil does he practic or teach? They do not know, and cannot tell. Socrates introduced his defense but saying group of wealthy young men came across him and getting angry with him for finding out that they really know nothing and call him the misleader of youth.But they cant even point out what particular thing that Socrates had corrupted them, his argument was how he corrupted the youth when nobody can tell what Socrates teach. Furthermore, Socrates uses his eloquent brilliantly to embarrass his accuser Meletus. Socrates brought out Meletus and constantly ask him top dog and set him up to step on the trap. The tricks that Socrates is trying to do is to make Meletus contradicts himself. From the point of the jury, I would say he is not guilty for corrupting the youth.On the jury, Socrates pretends that he is the corrupter and asks for the people who he have given them ad valetudinarianism to be his accusers, then he followed by a bulky list of names that he come across with. Besides, Socrates uses the word set up to emphasize his argument that Meletus should have produce some of witness that Socrates had gave them noisome advice and Socrates even volunteer to make way them. Judging from this point, I certainly know that Socrates is telling the truth and he is confident that he is not corrupting the youth.Besides, I also think that the charge of corrupting the youth is linked with other charges, like the Sophist charge, the Sophist were very distrusted by Athenians, if Socrates is found guilty for Sophist, he is certainly corrupting the youth too, vice versa. Besides, the analogy of the training of the horse is a convincing point, yet the young men also require training by a proficient teacher, and most people cannot do it, unless those youth are same as the horses. Therefore, he is found not guilty for corrupting the youth.The last charge against Socrates is not believed in the god of Athens, this charge is probably a review of the first charge, Physicist. If you do not believe in the god of Athens, than you essential be worshipping other god, therefore , Socrates accusers think he is inquiring the heaven and searching for thing beneath the earth. In order to defense against he, Socrates further asks Meletus question by interrogating him to what extent is mean by not the same gods which Athens recognizes. Later Socrates regards the sun as stone and doubt about if Meletus is accusatory Anaxagoras instead. You really think that I do not believe in any god? This quote clearly shows Socrates argument, as Socrates are being accused on the jury, he defend himself by questioning Meletus of not knowing his belief. Socrates horsemanship and flute-playing is definitely dubious for Meletus, as he did not answer the question but get up an interruption. For the judgment here, I would say Socrates is not guilty for not believing the god of Athens as he does believe in gods of Athens. In his defense, Socrates admitted that he do believe in divine beings, it must be spirits or window pane and he claims and make Meletus to say that Socrates is an atheist who believes in spiritual agencies and demigods.Socrates here successfully lead his accuser to admit that he have made a false accuse and have made up one just for charging Socrates. Without a valid accuse, how can Socrates be found guilty of not believing in the god of Athens? And yet Socrates is believes in the god of Athens. To conclude, if I were on the jury, I would found Socrates not guilty for the four charges. Nevertheless, the jury never wanted Socrates to die it is Socrates would fain lose his life. rightfulness is always the truth, if you endeavor to defense, someday you will success.